During today's lesson we watched an interrogation scene from "The Dark Knight" film by Christopher Nolan. Then we were given our Preliminary Task for our groups of three people each. The preliminary task was to create an interrogation scene, presenting the techniques of film making we learned so far such as: different angles of shots, framing, composition and continuity (shot/reverse-shot, 180 degree rule, match on action), which is all going to help us create mystery and suspense of the sequence.
The title of the interrogation scene is "6 ways to kill your husband (or wife)". In this lesson I learned what linear and non-linear film meant. Non-linear is when the film jumps and cuts through different scenes or starts from the end of the story and goes back to the start. A linear film is when the events happen chronollogically and in order, and they are not mixed up or neither the story is presented "backwards" (from end to start). This information I will need when creating my final production in my group as I might use this information to decide what my opening sequence would have a better effect. I have also learned about two different effects: omniscient and restricted. Omniscient effect in a film is when something happens and the audience knows it. They see the action and they know exactly what is going on in the film. However , restricted is when something happens unexpectedely, when it is not clear to the audience what is about to happen/take place.
I also wrote a synopsis for "the film" that the scene would have come from:
"A young, super-intelligent female police-detective, Emily Jarvis, interrogates a genius psychiatrist, James Atkinson, who is suspected of killing his own wife. During many interrogations and interviews, James Atkinson is trying to trick the police detective's mind with clever questions and statements that make no sense at first but then suddenly it all falls into place, when Emily Jarvis does a particular research on the famous, genius psychiatrist. It turns out James Atkinson is not who he said he was. It appeared from the early documentation that James Atkinson used to be a completely another person before he started his research on mentally diseased people. Emily Jarvis tries to find out the truth but she finds herself being dragged into a dark past of the suspect, his wife, his -what it appears to be amnesia -and other aspects that make Emily Jarvis question her own existance and identity and state of mind.
So who is James Atkinson and who was the man before him? Why there appear to be two people of the same looks but different names? Is it amnesia that affected James Atkinson, or was it just denial? Will Emily Jarvis find out the truth? Or will just lose her mind just like James Atkinson?"
No comments:
Post a Comment